At the beginning of parshas Shemos,
the Torah says, “And a new kind arose who did not know
Joseph...” (Exodus 1:8) Rav and Shmuel, amoraim, apply
two slightly different understandings to this verse. One of them
applies a literal understanding, saying that a new king was appointed
(usually implying the death of the previous). The other maintains
that it was fact the same king, but that he acted as if he did not
Joseph, i.e., he had a change of heart and became hostile to him.
What is peculiar about the king's new
attitude towards the Jews was the way in which he chose to oppress
them. The Torah says that he made them built the storage cities of
Pithom and Rameses. The Torah records the following:
He said to his people, "Behold,
the people of the children of Israel are more numerous and stronger
than we are. Get ready, let us deal shrewdly with them, lest they
increase, and a war befall us, and they join our enemies and depart
from the land." So they appointed over them tax collectors to
afflict them with their burdens, and they built store cities for
Pharaoh, namely Pithom and Raamses. (Exodus 1:9-11)
Rashi explains that these storage
cities “were originally unfit for this [storage], and they
strengthened them and fortified them for storage.”
While the king's
choice of punishment seems random, the elements come together in a
rather curious, yet telling, manner; there is an inherent
relationship between Joseph and the store houses. In parsha
Mikeitz (Genesis 41:1–44:17), Joseph saved all of Egypt by
proposing that grain be stored during the years of famine. Storage
implies store houses and demonstrates the fundamental link between
them and the Jews. As an expression of his new found hatred, the king
decrees that the Jews must build the very items that saved Egypt.
This is a clear indication that the days of glory had passed.
But something
deeper bubbles beneath the surface. In Derech Hashem, the
Ramcha”l states:
God thus made the rectification and
elevation of all creation totally dependent on the Jews. To the
extent that this can be expressed, we can thus say that He subjugated
His Providence to them. Through their deeds, they can cause [His
Light] to shine forth and have influence, or, on the other hand, hold
it back and conceal it.
The deeds of the other nations, on
the other hand, do not add to or subtract from the state of creation,
nor do they cause God to reveal Himself or withdraw. All they can do
is bring about their own gain or loss, and strengthen or weaken their
own directing angel. (Part 4 2:4:9)
The king's choice
of punishment was an expression of this Providence. The king
unknowingly adhered to his Divine programming to lash out against the
Jews for their sins. In another way, however, it was an
unpremeditated act of desperation, for through “their deeds (the
Jews), they can cause [His Light] to shine forth... (or) conceal it.”
If light isn't coming to the world, if the storage houses aren't
being filled, lash out against those responsible. I'm suggesting that
the “store houses” represent the reservoirs or banks of spiritual
accumulation that were running dry. Because the Jews apparently
failed in their role of causing the banks to be filled up, the king
forced them to build “store cities for Pharaoh.” Little
did he know that biting the hand that feeds you is not the way to go.
What we learn from this is that the Gentiles need this light just as
much as the Jews do and that they'll do what they need to get it.
The Jews control
the banks!
No comments:
Post a Comment