Showing posts with label Being Frum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Being Frum. Show all posts

Is it Possible to be Orthodox and Completely Miss the Point?

The Danger of Halacha - A Simple Model
Being a frum Jew requires us to know how to successfully navigate Halacha. This is a very important, nay, fundamental, aspect of Judaism because it keeps us away from aveiros. Perhaps the most basic element of observance of Torah is the ability to know what one is permitted to do versus what one is not permitted to do. This keeps us on the "straight and narrow."

While absolutely necessary, this approach nevertheless comes with a price tag and an implicit danger, and that danger is that it often leads a frum Jew to lose sight of the Torah's conceptualization of proper behavior.

The Breakdown
Let's break this down...

Every frum Jew knows that the Torah's two main classifications of mitzvos are positive (248) and negative (365). For the sake of clarity we will refer to positive mitzvos as "things that you must do," and negative mitzvos as "things that you must not do." These two classifications exist at polar opposites ends of the behavior spectrum. For example, I must wear tefillin; I must not murder.


So far, what has been said until now is basic and something that all Orthodox Jews agree on.

However, what comes next is not as clear. The distinction used when navigating Halacha is not must vs. must not, but rather can vs. cannot. If we think of these two in terms of the model above, it is relatively clear that the while the opposite of must not is must, the opposite of cannot is not can! In truth, "can" exists somewhere in between the two poles, and it has no opposite.

To make this easier to understand, we should realize that the words "must not" and "cannot" mean the same thing. When you ask your Rav a shaila and he says that you can't do something, his answer is based on that action being (or related to) an issur in the Torah. He says that you can't do it because the Torah says that you must not do it. Therefore "cannot" is the Halachic expression of a Torah prohibition and is equal to "must not."

Because the English terms may be confusing in this context using the Halachic terminology makes more sense. The opposite of issur (איִסוּר) is not heter (הֶתֵר), the opposite of issur is chiyuv (חִיוּב). For Halachic reasons it is necessary to classify things in this manner, but doing may so inadvertently lead us to lose track of the joy of observance and of the correct mindset.
This highlights the interesting realization that can is in fact a third category that falls in between must not and must; it is not the opposite of must not. In actuality, the can category is a very broad category that occupies the entire middle ground between these two polar opposites. We have become accustomed to treating can as the opposite of cannot, when it in fact refers to things that are neither mandatory nor restricted.
So What?
If we are able to keep this distinction clear in our heads then there is no problem with asking our rabbonim if we are permitted to do something. To the contrary, a person who has yiras shamayim and humility will seek out Halachic guidance.

The problem starts with our motivation when asking Halachic questions. While we may be asking our Rav what we can do from a genuine place of yiras shamayim, we may also be asking as a means to acquire Halachic permission to do something. The underlying reality of inquiring about Halachic permission may stem from a hidden desire to be liberated from obligation. The truth is that only the person asking the question knows his true motivation, although that may be debatable as well.

This does not indicate that the person asking the question is evil or seeks to cast off 'ol malchus shamayim, but instead is the fairly common tendency to lose focus of the purpose of observing commandments in the first place, which is to connect with God. The commandments become equated in his psyche with things that prevent pleasure. Regarding positive mitzvos, he looks for ways to avoid situations that obligate him. Regarding negative mitzvos, he looks for ways to get away with as much as he can without crossing the line into a transgression. He begins to operate almost completely in the "can zone" of the spectrum. He loses sight of the grand pleasure that may accompany performing mitzvos when understood in their proper context. If he is frum from birth, how does he find satisfaction in his lifestyle? If he is a ba'al teshuva, why has he become frum in the first place?

I always had a hard time understanding the following verses:

"All these curses will befall you, pursuing you and overtaking you to destroy you because you did not obey the Lord, your God, to observe His commandments and statutes which He commanded you. And they will be as a sign and a wonder, upon you and your offspring, forever, because you did not serve the Lord, your God, with happiness and with gladness of heart, when [you had an] abundance of everything." (Deuteronomy 28:45-47)

וּבָ֨אוּ עָלֶ֜יךָ כָּל־הַקְּלָל֣וֹת הָאֵ֗לֶּה וּרְדָפ֨וּךָ֙ וְהִשִּׂיג֔וּךָ עַ֖ד הִשָּֽׁמְדָ֑ךְ כִּי־לֹ֣א שָׁמַ֗עְתָּ בְּקוֹל֙ יְ-הֹוָ֣ה אֱ-לֹהֶ֔יךָ לִשְׁמֹ֛ר מִצְו‍ֹתָ֥יו וְחֻקֹּתָ֖יו אֲשֶׁ֥ר צִוָּֽךְ: וְהָי֣וּ בְךָ֔ לְא֖וֹת וּלְמוֹפֵ֑ת וּבְזַרְעֲךָ֖ עַד־עוֹלָֽם: תַּ֗חַת אֲשֶׁ֤ר לֹֽא־עָבַ֨דְתָּ֙ אֶת־יְ-הֹוָ֣ה אֱ-לֹהֶ֔יךָ בְּשִׂמְחָ֖ה וּבְט֣וּב לֵבָ֑ב מֵרֹ֖ב כֹּֽל:(דברים כח:מה-מז)

Perhaps this is what God meant.

Do We Still Need Feminism?

November 26, 2019 - Cheshvan 28, 5780

Frum Feminism

Supposed I said the following:

Never send a woman do to a man’s job.

The immediate gut reaction is to cringe at the sheer chauvinism needed to utter such a thing. This statement implies that a woman is incapable of performing a job designed for a man, indicating her essential inferiority. I would tend to agree that at least in certain cases such a statement may in fact indicate that sentiment.

Therefore, reversing the nouns in this statement should in theory end up with the reverse idea that men are less capable than women:

Never send a man to do a woman’s job.

The strange and unintended effect of the statement above, however, is quite unexpectedly the opposite. Instead of reversing the sentiment indicated in the first statement as expected, it is interpreted as well as expressing the equally chauvinistic concept that a woman is restricted into pre-defined tasks or careers.

In other words, saying “a man’s job” exists indicates womens’ general inferiority, but saying “a woman’s job” exists indicates womens’ being restricted into certain molds. You lose either way you cut it. It isn’t the syntax or grammar of the above sentence that forces this misinterpretation, but rather our pre-conditioned sensitivities to any subtleties that seem to imply sexism. It operates sort of like a heat-seeking device designed to search and identify any elements of chauvinism, even ignoring the general context of in which a statement is made.

Herein lies the interesting double-standard that seems to underline this dilemma that we find ourselves in. The modern expression of feminism is not about ensuring womens’ rights, suffrage, equal access to the workplace, equal pay for doing the same jobs, or freedom from sexual harassment. Today’s manifestation of feminism is almost purely ideological in character, seeking to establish the superiority of women while emasculating men. In its worst form it regards men as petty, miserable, useless, and gross. It is a gut reaction and hypersensitivity to even the most subtle indication that women need men in any way, shape, or form and sees it as a sacrilege.

The Effect on Religion

Suffice it to say that while this will certainly exact its toll on the already-suffering institution of marriage, it poses additional issues from the perspective of religiosity. Certain modern concepts of equality are supported by the traditional Torah perspective of Jewish living. In short, if something does not outright violate either the letter or spirit of Torah precepts, I imagine that there is room to consider it completely acceptable or even noble. The issue begins when a conflict arises between Torah values and modern values.

But without even mentioning feminism yet, it is noteworthy that the very Torah lifestyle is prescriptive and restrictive in nature, which is true whether the adherent is a man or a woman. Both men and women who are observant find themselves with obligations that they may feel contradict their personal desires in a number of ways. A Jewish man is required to wake up every morning for the rest of his life to pray with a minyan. While he’s at work (if he works) he is required to drop everything in the middle of the day and daven Mincha. When he gets home from work, when he may be tired and seeking the security of his family and home, is required to once again leave his safe circle and daven Ma’ariv. Even on Friday mornings, which in Israel is not customarily a work day, on the only day that he is not susceptible to the daily run-of-the-mill and he can theoretically sleep in, he is required to wake up in the morning as on any other day. In most cases it is ideal or even obligatory for him not to eat until he returns from the prayer service, which can take up to an hour. If he is a working man, he may pray on the train and then hurriedly eat a small breakfast at work before starting his day.

Temporarily setting aside other requirements placed upon a religious man, it is clear that the scenario described above may prove difficult for many a man. However, while one may certainly perceive this as a conflict between Torah and modern values, we do not imagine that he has any right to reject it on the grounds that it simply doesn’t suit him. Many men struggle and fail repeatedly in this area, which is nevertheless entirely different than casting it off due to inconvenience or to some imagined concept of entitlement or immunity from it.

We can understand a religious woman’s struggle in light of the description above. A Jewish woman has her own set of day-to-day difficulties, many in response to obligations placed upon her either by Halacha or Minhag. I have heard several married Jewish women speak of the difficulties and discomfort of keeping their hair covered at all times in public and of abiding by regulations of modest attire. Their arguments are often not frivolous or trivial, but express a genuine difficulty from either a practical or ideological perspective, or both. I can empathize because I myself have my own issues with certain obligations that I have.

Ideological Struggle

The issue begins when we add the fire of ideological motivation into the equation. I have heard several feministically-inclined religious women express their revulsion that a man has the nerve to dictate the Halacha for them. When a woman assumes that she is free from Halachic obligations only on the grounds that the people who legislate Halacha are men, she is in fact simply saying that she does not care what the Halacha says. It is no different whether I as a man reject Halacha or whether a woman does. I can certainly make the case that the rabbi’s cannot fully comprehend or appreciate the difficulties that I experience as a working, religious man. It makes no difference that we are the same sex, because aside from that similarity our lifestyles are completely different. In fact, many men who struggle with their observance to the point where they discard it often make this very argument – the goals of Judaism do not line up with my own. In religious circles we have a term for that, it’s called “going off the derech”.

Could we imagine, for a moment, if the shoe was on the other foot? Could we imagine a parallel universe in which women were the rabbi's, and a women gave me a psak to daven three times a day and that women are only required to daven once a day? Would I have the right, or would it be sensible for me, to disqualify her psak on the grounds that she was a woman? If women were the leading religious authorities, then their gender is completely irrelevant to the power vested in them to generate Halachic legislation.

A married Jewish man expects his wife to be committed as he is to a lifestyle that they have each chosen, just as a married Jewish woman expects from her husband. It cannot work if one commits to this lifestyle while the other does not.

At the end of the day one must make a choice, whether man or woman, of whether to find the best optimal solution in light of a lifestyle that comes with obligations, knowing full well that part of the territory is occasional failure, or to simply reject that lifestyle.

The Holocaust And The Damaged Jewish Identity

The Holocaust has done its number on the Jewish People. I am not referring to the damage that the Holocaust has caused in the simple sense of reducing our numbers in the world, or to the destruction of Jewish communities long present in many parts of Europe. I am not even referring to the actual survivors who emerged intact, but many with serious mental and emotional illnesses and psychoses.

Instead, I am referring to the ongoing moral degradation that many a young Jew has experienced due to this horrific event. These individuals were born decades after the end of the Holocaust and yet the darkness of that set of events has shaped their very identity as Jews. While I believe it to be of utmost importance for curriculum to treat the Holocaust with the respect and sensitivity it deserves, one thing is equally true: an unintended effect is that the Holocaust takes on a central role in the definition of Jewish identity. That is a disaster, and dare I say transports the evil of the Holocaust into the very lifeblood of the Jews long after it has perished. Like a virus, the Holocaust then duplicates the memory of itself into the very self-consciousness of a Jew.


If my observation is correct, the result is very tragic for the self-perception of a Jew, even on the subconscious scale. All he can think about when it comes to being a Jew is that the Nazis tried to annihilate his people, but only succeeded in murdering 6 million. The intellectual and emotional strain, especially for a young, developing mind, can be unfathomable. If so many were so vigilantly impassioned to wiping your grandparents’ generation off of the face of the earth, maybe they were right that there is something deviously wrong with your people. Why should he want anything to do with Judaism under such circumstances? If he's going to alienate himself, it should at least be for something good.

Again, I am careful to distinguish between over-inundation with the Holocaust and with education. The problem begins when a Jew focuses on the grim calamities that began in that morbid generation over the joys of being a Jew. Being a Jew is a great thing and a gift, although it takes a paradigm shift to truly appreciate it. Seeing Jewish identity in terms of the Chosen People versus the Hated People can fill one with a sense of appropriate self-esteem. Perceiving that the single most important event in Jewish history was not the Holocaust on the mountains of Hell, but the revelation of the Torah on Mount Sinai, can permeate one’s heart with joy. Comprehending and contemplating on the fact that God Almighty drives the events of this world instead of a party of fanatical, murderous apes, is the window to solace.

A fantastically large rock has been dropped in the path of an outstanding source of light. That rock is the Holocaust and that light is the Torah. There is no denying that the Holocaust occurred and that it should be studied. However, today’s Jew is free to side-step that pain and anguish and step into the light. We are detached enough to give ourselves a break and be liberated from the gnawing misery that obfuscates the sensational splendor of what it really means to be a Jew.

I cannot be so pompous as to suggest that my sentiment applies to all Jews. However, part of what pushed me towards the mindstyle of observant Judaism was a distinct feeling that a feeling of self-disgust lingered in the psyche of the Jewish People. If that doesn't apply to you then by all means ignore what I said. If you were mentally healthier than me, I applaud you. Nevertheless, since then observance has provided me with many good things, but at that time its main function was to loosen the restrictions of a damaged Jewish identity.

Six Golden Rules for Being Frum at Work

These are not really rules, but more like good suggestions, for being good at being frum in a largely secular work environment. The more people you work with the more dynamic, and therefore, complex, the environment. You can try to go through work passively so as not to bring attention to your Judaism, but it is likely that at some point or another somebody will bring it up or ask you a question in some way. Some people look for this and some rather just do their job and go home. Either way, I've used these golden rules to establish good relationships with the people I work with.

1. Chessed or Gevura?
Chessed refers to a behavioral pattern of reaching out and eliminating boundaries, while gevura refers to withholding and drawing inwards. This is useful in general when dealing with others, but can also be applied to how much Yiddishkeit to bring to the table as a topic of discussion. The fine line is important here because Judaism needs neither to be contraband or excessive. This is Israel and Israelis are Jews – if they want to speak with “one of us” about something Jewish, by all means let them. Just know that they won’t always hear what they want to, which can make things awkward and/or give them a bad taste of Judaism. The perfect fusion of both is tiferes and can be used at the workplace as a practical method.

2. Trust
There are not many outlets in Israel for Orthodox and secular Jews to interact with each other on a regular basis. If you go to work five days a week, by definition you are in a position create such an opportunity. Since some Israelis might have negative views of Orthodox Jews, they’ll eventually start wondering who this black and white frum guy is doing in our office on a regular basis. The fact that you’re doing the same work they are and know how to handle yourself in an industry starts to erode away at some of their stereotypes.

3. The Best Thing is Silence
If you don’t know how to answer something, are too bogged down with work to think straight, it is perhaps better to refrain from certain topics. Given the sensitive nature of certain subjects, it’s wise to discuss a topic with a few people at a time, not ten people during lunch when people are trying to look good in front of each other. People are often in a jovial mood during this time and are releasing the stress of work. By discussing Judaism in this environment you might be opening yourself (and Judaism) up to ridicule, even though what you’re saying isn't ridiculous. Certain topics in Judaism must be delivered tactfully, which is harder to do with a larger audience.

4. Mi LeHashem Elai!
This means “whoever is to God, join me,” and it’s what Moses said to the Jews after the worship of the Golden Calf. If you feel more comfortable with fewer people, you can gradually feel out one or two people who have an interest in Jewish topics and only talk to them about it. At a previous job I used to sit with one guy in particular when work was slow and get into Ramchal, Midrashim, and other deep Jewish topics. We are still in touch.

5. Be Jewish
Your frumkeit isn't a costume, it’s real. Do as you do when nobody’s around. Say al netilas yada’im out loud. Bentsch with kavana. Say asher yatzar when you leave the bathroom. Daven Mincha if there is one in your office, or do so alone, but don’t shy away from being seen. Let them know that Judaism exists, is real, and that you care about it. Even passive actions bring Judaism into the workplace – set down your tallis bag and siddur on your desk next to your cup of pens and telephone.

6. A Time to Kill
Most of the time people are civilized, but you might eventually meet a joker, or even a hater. The best first step is to momentarily pause and reflect before acting. Realize that this person most likely doesn't know what he’s talking about, so you don’t need to internalize anything he’s said. Nevertheless, you might not like to walk away from a verbal conflict appearing like you've been put in your place. You might have to be a bit creative here depending on the comment. For example, if someone says that Chareidim steal, you can say that what he knows about Chareidim is largely informed from what he sees on the news and less from he has personally experienced. It’s a brief, true statement that not many people can argue with. The point is not to kill opinions, but to draw out a truer examination. The next time he, or anybody who was there, wants to say that, they’ll think twice.

Water Cooler Dialogue

January 21, 2015 - Shevat 1, 5775

Frum At Work

I work in Israel’s high tech industry as a technical writer, a job which seems to be perfect for me, thank God. Given that the majority of Israeli’s in this industry are not religious, I work regularly with secular Jews. 95% of the time my interaction with them is positive to the extent that every once in a while, somebody will bring up some sort of religious topic with me. I find this to be very encouraging and, within boundaries appropriate for the workplace, I am more than happy to discuss Judaism with them.

Having said that, while I was listening to someone today explain his view on Judaism to me, it occurred to me that no systematic view of Judaism exists among secular Israeli’s. What I mean, in my past discussions I’ve observed that every person has his own personal take on Judaism. This view is compiled of a variety of elements such as individual sentiment, breadth of knowledge, personal experience, and in some cases influence by the media.

I will momentarily recap the dialogue I had with this individual, but in this particular case I did not get more involved in the discussion due to the subject matter. It seemed to me that this individual was making a fundamental mistake about the topic he was discussing. Given that we had not previously established a rapport, he would have probably been put off if I tried to present a more accurate view, and so I left it alone (which was hard for me to do).

I should also add that this individual is an intelligent, astute person who is sought after by other employees for his expertise. What shocks me is the contrast between intelligence and professional knowledge on one hand and relatively little knowledge of Judaism on the other. Without trying to insult anybody, what it does teach me is that a person can be highly developed and refined in one area and quite lacking in another. The ideal state of a person is development in both the spiritual and the physical arenas.


I wanted to go into arichus and say to him that the Torah speaks about God as real and not imagined, and that it is also impossible to create something that is greater than you. I decided to leave it alone; I could sense that it would have challenged him in a way that he wasn’t ready for, which would have made things awkward. I find that there are certain golden rules when discussing Yiddishkeit with secular coworkers, and this would have violated one of them. If we had worked together more or the environment was different, such as outside, I would have said what was on my mind.

The complexity of this type of interaction is that secular Israeli’s often expect religious Jews to be sensitive to their beliefs and not pushy. Some do not understand that expressing ideas based on whims and cultural impressions is somewhat patronizing to people who take it seriously. Judaism is not open to free interpretation any more than the medical or legal fields. One of the realities of this type of discussion is that it is complicated by perceptions of Orthodox Jews in the media (part of which is our doing). Overstep your “right” to your opinions and you’ve fulfilled the intolerant Orthodox Jew stereotype.

Stumbling Blocks

Coming soon...

How Did I Become Frum?

If I could describe my decision to become frum in one sentence, I would say that I always flirted with God and finally decided to enter into a committed relationship.

I would also say that there is nothing more special about my becoming frum than anybody else's. The only reason I'm writing about it is so that I can understand it. And it's long as it's written I might as well post it.

Over the years since I became frum (in 2001) I've occasionally stopped to think of why I did so. It was a recalculation, revisitation, and re-establishment of the decisions and processes that occurred during that important year in my life. With the clarity of hindsight I am better able to identify the various moving pieces that came together in that decision. To put it very simply, many converging elements intersected that made Orthodox Judaism a very clear conclusion.

I attended a Conservative Jewish school from Kindergarten to sixth grade. At that point I left that school and started attending a public school, which marked my first real interaction with Gentiles. By seventh grade I had no Jewish friends, and aside from Jewish family, most of the friends who attended my Bar Mitzvah were Gentiles.

The most vulnerable of those elements was a constant search for an identity that made sense, and by made sense I obviously mean for one that made sense to me. Notwithstanding that all people need a sense of identity, my particular search was related to my being raised with a foot in two countries (Israel and America). My mother is Israeli and my father is American, and the fact that my mother is Sefardi and father Ashkenazi contributed to a partially confused identity. Either way you cut it I was all over the place and was only partially able to identify with each. I sought out a stable, anchored identity.

This led me to piece together an “map,” moving backwards through layers of identity. Being Israeli was a good place to start, but Israel was young. America was older, but I knew that I could reach farther back than that as well. I eventually reached a conceptually satisfying stopping point; the Torah was the one thing capable of producing a stable, defined Jewish identity. It was the origin of who and what I was, and so I stopped there. But it was only theoretical and conceptual – I had not yet started observing Judaism.

My scattered identity also didn’t make high school easier (does anything?). During those years I growingly and painfully realized that although I had much affection and appreciation for my American Gentile friends, there were things about me that they could not fully understand. It was a portion of myself that I had to keep away from our friendship, an aspect of myself that I could only enjoy in the presence of my family. Even then, I was limited in this regard due both to my restricted knowledge and to my family’s comfort level. This led me on a silent, inward journey of establishing a personal system of beliefs. But this system too was only theoretical and conceptual.

This system was undoubtedly colored by our home, which contained Jewish religious objects, such as menoras, mezuzahs, and matzos. But the short-lived weekly practice of Kiddush and yearly visits to synagogue weren’t enough. I often pushed my family to spend more time lighting Chanukah candles. My parents are to credit for bringing these things into the home and I yearned for them. At the same time I also began thinking about intellectual, philosophical, and mystical topics, which gave me great joy, but also put me at odds with my friends and family. I was very spiritual during this time, fond of whatever I knew of Judaism, but not at all interested in religiosity. I lacked a very basic understanding of what Jewish practice even meant, and the concept of obligatory practice was more foreign than anything.

In college I came to a brief conclusion that atheism was the logical outcome of monotheism and considered myself an atheist for a time. This was also a meager self-defense mechanism against the arguments of a Christian adjunct professor that I had in college. By the end of my Old Testament class, in which I was the token (ignorant) Jew, I began pondering whether Christianity was true and what my family would think of me. Since I didn’t know enough about Judaism to successfully deter Christianity, I simply activated an emergency shut down to my spiritual system. I was not capable of explaining why I rejected Christianity, but I felt that it was the farthest thing away from anything pure or good or right. I preferred to abandon spirituality than to associate the desires that came with it with this foreign, alien, system. This was a time of great turmoil.

Sometime after begin to attend the University of Arizona, I had met some Jewish friends and together we ran an Israel advocacy group on campus. It was the first time in about eight years that I had made Jewish friends. During that time I began thinking about my defenses of Israel, and one day I went home and made a list of all the arguments I’ve heard against this country. I told myself that if I found one fundamental flaw in an argument I would discard it and move to the next. After eliminating the fundamental driving force behind each one (of about ten major points), I concluded that no good reason existed for the hatred of Israel that I witnessed. Desperate for an explanation, I grabbed for something that I had not bothered to consider; perhaps the prophets of Israel were correct. Perhaps our disobedience to the Torah was causing us problems? If so, although I advocated for Israel, I was actually part of the problem. It was all too much to handle so I pushed the idea away into the recesses of my mind.

During this time I had become aware that, regarding the subject of Israel, the majority of American Jews had either left wing sympathies or were apathetic. I slowly realized that many young American Jews were stuck in a sort of social conditioning that forbade them from deviating from that milieu. To make bold, yet in reality moderate and conceivable statements, such as "Israel belongs to the Jews," cast suspicion of extremism or insanity. And yet Arab youth, either in America or elsewhere, were not plagued by the same epidemic of insecurity in their nationalist sentiments, to whom it was quite natural to love. Notwithstanding that Arab societies often take it to the other extreme, being a Jew seemed associated with accepting a bullied and meager position of sheepishly avoiding confrontation. I found this very personally denigrating and felt it was wrong to feel guilty.

Yet this feeling was difficult to shake. Being proud to be Jewish was a matter of necessity unless I was prepared to abandon that identity altogether. Little did I know that this pride would later take me to the brink of religiosity, a transformation that was at once seamless, yet not obvious. Religiosity was the natural conclusion of being comfortable in my skin as a Jew. I would later find it impossible to separate my Jewish identity from a religious one. How could one be authentically Jewish stripped of the element of religion, which gave birth to the Jewish identity in the first place?

A while later I went on a Birthright trip to Israel. I was initially rejected, but through the phone call of a member of the Hillel at the University of Arizona, I was accepted. During an amazing trip, we spent a Friday afternoon at the Kosel in Jerusalem. I told myself that I would let God take control of this situation and move myself out of the way, but was insecure in how long I could stay in that position. I put my hands on the Wall and prayed the only way I knew how and eventually I had what I can only explain as a series of powerful visions that came in the form of what I guess you would consider to be very concentrated thoughts. I cannot describe them here because there were many, but in this state I decided that I had to become an observant Jew. That Shabbos I briefly went to a Kabbalos Shabbos, and although I enjoyed it I found myself lost in the service, and probably left early. I slept in for Shacharis.

When I got home during early January, I believe, I began to think about my experience and to plan out my foray into Judaism. I did this first by giving other religions a chance. I immediately filtered out all eastern religions on the basis that they were not monotheistic. I then would consider Christianity only if it provided answers to questions that Judaism could not. And if Christianity could not answer these questions, I would consider Islam. Since Judaism provided a good answer to every major issue I thought of, I found no reason to try something else.

See Part 2 for how I started my process of observance.

By the way, here's something that I managed to pull "out of the archives" from December 2006:

I eventually realized that the views that I held could no longer be considered secular. The change was not so dramatic that I could say it occurred overnight, but rather was a growing set of changes that were occurring in the way I thought about things. At a certain point in time, and it’s possible that it could have occurred earlier or later, they culminated into a coherent set of ideas that were not accurately representative of what you would normally call a secular person. At the point in time of that culmination I looked at myself, and although I saw the same person that I had always been, I had realized a new facet to my being, that I was not a secular Jew and could not associate with that identity. That was more or less the realization that I was an Orthodox Jew and that the Orthodox world was the world in which I belonged. It was as if the sum of my parts came together and I understood a more complete picture of whom I actually was. This was in no way a replacement of who I was but rather a certain coming to fruition of my personality and my thoughts; you could definitely consider it a type of maturation. It was a rounding off of the edges, a placing together of disparate pieces of my being into a more coherent picture.

Previous to this, the external manifestation I was going through was expressed as a level of discomfort with certain things around me and often times came with a feeling of not belonging. The discomfort generally applied to social situations, and in this I open up my experience to the criticism of a person who wants to pin my change on social awkwardness. However, it would be more accurate to say that I was frustrated with the nature of the interaction of many of my friends and peers, behaviors that I considered superficial, negative, and to a degree, resembling a power struggle between those very friends. This was not something I felt I wanted to or could be a part of, and so I was always a bit on the outskirts of my relationship with those people.

There are reasons other than philosophical retaliation, if you want to call it that, for my feeling separated from my friends to the degree that I did; the way they thought and behaved was not the only factor. It was clear that my Jewish identity was a part of me, and although it was an obscured identity that often confused me more than it shed light, it was as if it was infused onto my bones and into my blood, and I could not shed it. My ability to realize that I was different in this sense from my friends, all of whom came from Christian families, played a serious role in putting certain obstacles between them and me. The culture in which my parents raised me, although generally not observant, had fostered a deep awareness of our Jewishness. It was only when I was only able to figure out how that piece of myself fit into the whole that I was able to feel comfortable with it and to love it. Until then my Jewishness was a bittersweet concoction of identity that both blessed me and cursed me. In retrospect I can understand how Jews have chosen to assimilate, Jews who were in much more miserable situations than was I (such as those of the Inquisition). I should thank G-d every day that I chose to assimilate in rather than out. My friends were not to blame for my feeling of alienation from them, it was a symptom of my inability to recover from my Jewishness and for the most part they tried to be as accommodating as possible.

During this time, usually on my own, I would read whatever Jewish material I could get my hands on, completely unaware at that point of the existence of differing paradigms of observance of the Torah. I build up a reserve of stories and partially developed understandings of what Judaism was, but for the most part I kept those away from my friends, and even my family. My interest was sparked from these things and I began to be a bit pushy with my family as to some of the Jewish traditions, such as lighting candles on Chanukah in a specific way, etc… For a few years we lit candles on Friday night, and since my knowledge of Jewish ritual didn’t far exceed that, I sought for my family to do whatever we did in the perfect way. During Passover, for example, I insisted that we read the entire Hagadah from front to back and was annoyed when we read through it quickly, as if just to get to the meal. I even recall expressing my anger to my aunt about how many Jews (in America) were almost totally unmotivated to really feel Judaism.

Another relevant factor was my being born in Israel and my family’s deep attachment to our family “back home,” my mom’s side. Our several trips to Israel over the summers provided me with several positive experiences, many of them occurring on the cusps between adolescence and maturity. Among that, the trips also did something deeper, they put me in touch with a sense of who or what I might have been had we not moved to America when I was six years old. My formative years in America were relatively tough; I developed a dual or hybrid identity forcing me to grapple with the question of who I was and Israel was often the potential key to that answer.

As I began college and slowly but surely saw less and less of my high school friends, I began to meet Jews. My Jewish education ended in sixth grade and during the last eight or so years, my only friends were Gentiles. Now that I was suddenly meeting other Jews, whom also loved Israel like I did, I felt that I could really connect with them. Those people are still my friends to this day. Eventually I joined a pro-active Israel action group on campus that two of them began; finally an outlet for my love of Israel and Judaism. As I became aware of the liberal hatred of the State of Israel on campus, I began to question my previously unquestioned politically liberal views, which to me were inseparable from idealism. Painfully, and after some period of time, I realized that I had to give up some, or many, of my liberal preconceptions on the nature of the universe, scrapping the notion that goodness was to be automatically equated with liberalness. Goodness, it seemed, was not fully formed simply in the liberal view of the world, and slowly, slowly I began to form more conservative views, at least with regards to Israel. My growingly conservative views on Israel, which were identified by not being afraid to state politically incorrect truths regarding the hatred towards Israel. I soon realized, after trying to see it in many ways, that this hatred was held together by one thing above all, that Israel was full of Jews.

Rather than shying away from standing up for our rights as Jews in Israel, as many Jews did, I reasoned that we should not feel guilty about stating what was ours. It was neither necessary nor acceptable to stand up for everybody else’s rights except our own; I did not see it as a violation of liberal thought, but rather as an accurate embodiment of it, to stand up for our own rights. Every year Jews got together on the campus mall to recollect the murder of six million Jews in the Holocaust by reading their names from a list; why could we not speak out for the Jews dying today, the living Jews, with the same vigour with which we spoke for those who have already perished? I began to fear that had the Jews who did not speak out for their living brothers lived in the time of the Intifada, similarly they would have not spoken out for their brothers in the camps either. I had already begun to seriously question the resolve of many liberal-leaning Jews to actually bettering their situation. I feared that they were stuck in some continuously repeating time portal of guilt and paranoia that caused them to endlessly read the names of Jews murdered in the past. If their commitment to ending injustice towards Jews was so strong, then there were plenty of Jews dying today for whom they could speak, but more often they violated their “Never Again” ethos by remaining silent.

A while later, “by an accident of the universe,” I was sent on a Birthright trip by which I was initially rejected. Michelle Blumberg, executive director of the Hillel at the University of Arizona, put in a call to the Los Angeles-Israeli Consulate explaining to them that I had never been on an organized trip to Israel. After a moment of her being put on hold, they confirmed that I was accepted to the trip. A week and a half later I was on a plane to Israel, and later, in Jerusalem, standing at the Kotel (Western Wall), the culmination written about in the first paragraph occurred. I knew that I believed in G-d, which meant that G-d had designed a way to communicate with humanity, which had to be the Torah, and that Israel was of utmost importance to Judaism, and at that point in time I realized that I was an Orthodox Jew.

Comment below.